Sunday, February 28, 2010
4 comments:
Please note: Comments are moderated. Only civilised conversation is permitted on this blog. Criticism is perfectly okay; uncivilised language is not. We delete any comment which is spam, has personal attacks against anyone, or uses foul language. We delete any comment which does not contribute to the intellectual discussion about the blog article in question.
LaTeX mathematics works. This means that if you want to say $10 you have to say \$10.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I wish the finmin would state the inflation (or gdp deflator) and gdp numbers together for the past year and for the forecasts (and that may mean quoting RBI's policy target for inflation). The point being that in the past two years wpi inflation has outpaced GDP growth so I fail to share the enthusiasm of a "recovery" when it isn't a "real" one. Real growth: gdp - wpi inflation averaged 4% in 2005-2007. So, when the finmin says that the target for next fiscal is going to be 9% growth, I'd like to know what his inflation expectations are: 5% as for the 2005-7 period or higher? My point is not to be pessimistic but to avoid fetish for higher growth rates without regard for real growth rates or price stability. Looking at the last two years what would have been better: 6% nominal growth with 6% inflation and a higher deficit or 3% nominal growth with 3% inflation and a lower deficit?
ReplyDelete@Anonymous - The reported GDP is real GDP i.e. after accounting for inflation and not nominal GDP.
ReplyDeleteIndia's Nominal GDP (i.e. Real GDP + inflation) has been over 10% for some time.
Duh!
ReplyDelete@ anon and @abhikush
ReplyDeleteThe greatest fool can ask what the wisest man can not answer